skippy1969 said:They were both under $12.00 for the pair,so I think they qualify as "cheapys Ira..........![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
They have line in and other features...DISQUALIFIED!




skippy1969 said:They were both under $12.00 for the pair,so I think they qualify as "cheapys Ira..........![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
skippy1969 said:Old school Scott said:OK before we go any further let's make the qualifier list
Cheapy must have:
1. fake tweeters
2. no stereo inputs for CD and ipod.
3.a tone knob instead of separate bass and treble.
4.?
Cheers OSS :afro
Oh ok I got it now,sorry I thought you meant cheapy $$$$$.
How about this Yorx?
[ Image ]
nz boom said:
Beautiful but have 5 band equalizer. So disqualifiedOld school Scott said:How about this JVC RC680 from Drmz's collection?![]()
http://www.flickr.com/photos/radio_drmz/4778321484/in/photostream
Cheers OSS![]()
Screw you Freddie,it doesn't say anything about a walkman feature and detatchable speakers........oldskool69 said:skippy1969 said:Old school Scott said:OK before we go any further let's make the qualifier list
Cheapy must have:
1. fake tweeters
2. no stereo inputs for CD and ipod.
3.a tone knob instead of separate bass and treble.
4.?
Cheers OSS :afro
Oh ok I got it now,sorry I thought you meant cheapy $$$$$.
How about this Yorx?
[ Image ]
STILL disqualified! The cheapy can't have a walkman function and detachable speakers!!!![]()
Too "deluxe".![]()
I was concentrating on the part about it being the "prettiest.". Good thing most of the pretty boomers are/were cheap. Like this one:redbenjoe said:thanks for sharing
AZA said:How about this AWA... yeah it looks familiar