I understand paying top dollar for something when it's in great shape and electrically refurbished, or at least all working.
But this one to me just seems plain stupid. But then again, it's not my type of box and I'm not in the market for one so I guess you can never underestimate the actions of somebody that wants something bad enough. I also dislike it when people selectively disclose. This one reeks of it. Why test tape B with a tape but then deliberately NOT test tape A without putting a tape in it. That begs the question. Then says his tech says a part broke in Tape A and it can be fixed if the part can be found but what part is it and where do you get it from? Conion parts department? And he can't afford to pay to fix it but then doesn't disclose the repair estimate? And why would a tech look at it and NOT fix it, if just a simple rebelt? I never knew a tech to provide free estimates. When it's all open, it gets fixed since it also costs money to NOT fix it. Something doesn't smell all OK with this so not saying it can't be true. Just saying it smells fishy and doesn't all add up.... Selective disclosure.
If you read the code between the lines, I think he's saying Tape B can be fixed/rebelted and Tape A probably can never be fixed since a broken part (read: unobtanium) needs to be substituted.