Fatdog said:I would like a subwoofer output that is controlled by the volume - not fixed like a line-out jack.![]()
You mean like the Hitachi 3Ds and similar, which have a "subwoofer" - type speaker just for the bass, that's controlled by the volume?Fatdog said:I would like a subwoofer output that is controlled by the volume - not fixed like a line-out jack.![]()
Not exactly. It would be more like the subwoofer out on the backs of receivers.Retro Addict said:You mean like the Hitachi 3Ds and similar, which have a "subwoofer" - type speaker just for the bass, that's controlled by the volume?
If so, surely those iconic designs we all love (generally two large round woofers and a cassette in the middle) would not exist in that form.
Ok, next question is, what powered the sub? Boombox or sub amp?Reli said:Some Aiwa bookshelf systems had outputs like that (and they sold a sub separately).
Ah I see, thanks.Fatdog said:Not exactly. It would be more like the subwoofer out on the backs of receivers.
Sub amp.Lasonic TRC-920 said:Ok, next question is, what powered the sub? Boombox or sub amp?
Beosystem10 said:Technics SAC05L came with the option of a sub, it has its own amp which takes its audio source from the line out sockets on the back of the box itself. The one in the photie isn't mine so apologies if you didn't want its image using, let me know if so and I'll take it down:
![]()
I use my SAC05L with a sub intended for an old Toshiba Dolby surround TV, it doesn't look as impressive as the genuine one shewn in that picture, I suspect it doesn't sound as good either.
Yes, the sub is designed to go with the box, it was an optional extra when it was new. The SAC05L cost £439.99 when my parents bought mine for my 18th, back in December 1982. The sub would have cost an additional £209.99. I had the choice but opted for the matching SLQ202 turntable instead as the box itself wasn't lacking in bass and a better means of playing my records mattered more to me.Reli said:That's insane. Are you sure that sub was actually intended for the SAC05? It jst seems strange that Technics really expected many people to buy it. I mean these are just little 3-piece systems meant for someone's dorm room. They're not gonna have enough room for that sub. Plus I bet that sub cost just as much as the boombox!
I don't mind this if they're linear and close enough to treat as one (Sharp GF9191, etc.) but having two rotary ones as found on a National Panasonic RS460 and a couple of the larger Hackers is a little annoying.Zippy said:What no boombox should have is separate left/right volume control. Make it volume and balance please.
Absolutely! It's the most irritating featureZippy said:What no boombox should have is separate left/right volume control. Make it volume and balance please.