Water analogies for transistors

thinkchronicity

Member (SA)
Kinda technical, but i thought to put it here. I recently came across the water/propellor inductor analogy which i think is fantastic, so i wondered if there was one for transistors. Yep...here it is. Check out the PNP one especially!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241104-151037.png
    Screenshot_20241104-151037.png
    103.4 KB · Views: 11
  • Screenshot_20241104-151015.png
    Screenshot_20241104-151015.png
    80.4 KB · Views: 11

thinkchronicity

Member (SA)
Why do I feel less smart after looking at those? :dunce::blink::lol:
Heh heh ... looking again at the mechanical PNP one, well, it wouldn't even work! The cord won't pull up the emitter hatch when the base opens.
I'm working on a water based transformer analogy using propellors that have magnetically coupled gear 'teeth' on the outside. The bigger propellor in one water pipe, equivalent to the transformer primary, then turns say a smaller propellor (the secondary), which spins faster in its water pipe. Faster means more pressure= more voltage but less unit flow= less current.
Are you following all this??

Edit: the only problem with this model is that with steady state 'DC' water flow it would couple...obvs no good..damn
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ken

caution

Member (SA)
Fixed it for you :lol:

54118416612_1e70cd7f95_o.jpg


Original is from "Electronics for Inventors" by Paul Scherz
54118413767_ebe7f91bc3_o.jpg
 

Ken

Member (SA)
Heh heh ... looking again at the mechanical PNP one, well, it wouldn't even work! The cord won't pull up the emitter hatch when the base opens.
I'm working on a water based transformer analogy using propellors that have magnetically coupled gear 'teeth' on the outside. The bigger propellor in one water pipe, equivalent to the transformer primary, then turns say a smaller propellor (the secondary), which spins faster in its water pipe. Faster means more pressure= more voltage but less unit flow= less current.
Are you following all this??

Edit: the only problem with this model is that with steady state 'DC' water flow it would couple...obvs no good..damn
These would tend to act more like a degenerate semiconductor, a semiconductor doped with enough impurity to behave in some ways like a metal, an impurity band that connects the valence shells at the atomic level which would then resemble the water flow shown here. Im still missing how all this conveys how a semiconductor truly operates, ie as the temperature of the semiconductor goes up, it acts more like a conductor and less like an insulator. I get how the two different flow directions emulate the two different p and n doping processes (valence shell electron vs hole theory.)

This is close, it just needs to somehow account for temperature, or am I just missing the whole floating boat here?

Plum in a tankless hot water heater…

Merrily merrily merrily life is but a dream. Or a thought experiment. Whatever. lmao.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: thinkchronicity