So far! New baby last week.

Status
Not open for further replies.

347 Tony

Member (SA)
Last week acquired a PC-550! These are all of mine with the exception of my 90 ,still out for the volume control. :sad: Compared to these It Is by far the best sounding to me. (BUT NOT WITHOUT A VOLUME CONTROL) Lol Bottom 71 Is a part's box ,It got my other one working! Yayyyyy

img_03941.jpg
 

347 Tony

Member (SA)
oldskool69 said:
The PC-555/550 is a hoss. And you have some other nice selections with it. :thumbsup:
It Is a nice box In good shape but she just doesn't match the sound of the 90 for the weight of the damm thing! Lol Tk's for looking guy's.
 

347 Tony

Member (SA)
im_alan_partridge said:
Great collection, hows that big panny 3 piecer sound, ive heard they are one of the best sounding 3 piecers :hmmm:
Sound's good but It Is a newer box with CD but really decent for what It Is. No where's near the weight of the 550
 

im_alan_partridge

Member (SA)
Hey, nothing wrong with a good CD box :yes: ive got an Hitachi 3D with a CD, tbh its not much of a looker but its got good sound, its loud and it dosnt matter if i get burger grease or beer on it :lol:

Ive always liked that Panny (with or without the CD :-D ) but they dont come up that often round my way.
And when they do im always tapped out :'-( :lol:
 

Jboogie2384

Member (SA)
Great start!! :thumbsup: I have a silver 550 and I hooked it up with LED's. Great sounding unit!! I too also have a Panny minus the CD player and I'm amazed at the bass that pumps out. Congrats. And I agree with the comment about the m70's. everybody has one except him and I. It's all good tho.
 

oldskool69

Moderator
Staff member
347 Tony said:
oldskool69 said:
The PC-555/550 is a hoss. And you have some other nice selections with it. :thumbsup:
It Is a nice box In good shape but she just doesn't match the sound of the 90 for the weight of the damm thing! Lol Tk's for looking guy's.

Can't argue that point. I've had two PC-55's and it's amazing given the engineering of similar sized units with similar power, that these JVC's were so bass shy. You can swap out the woofs for better ones and get the bass back it should have. I believe that the intent withe the design was to protect the woefully inadequate drivers that came with these units. I can easily recall back in the day watching the speakers get destroyed. :-)
 

347 Tony

Member (SA)
oldskool69 said:
347 Tony said:
oldskool69 said:
The PC-555/550 is a hoss. And you have some other nice selections with it. :thumbsup:
It Is a nice box In good shape but she just doesn't match the sound of the 90 for the weight of the damm thing! Lol Tk's for looking guy's.

Can't argue that point. I've had two PC-55's and it's amazing given the engineering of similar sized units with similar power, that these JVC's were so bass shy. You can swap out the woofs for better ones and get the bass back it should have. I believe that the intent withe the design was to protect the woefully inadequate drivers that came with these units. I can easily recall back in the day watching the speakers get destroyed. :-)
Weird I had a 70 new ,a 90 new and a 55 new ,even back In 83/84 ,I alway's liked the 90 the best ,I only bought the 55 cause It was detachable, the Novelty of that wore off real quick. Lol I found those little speaker's Plopped alot sooner than the other's, but I do remember the 55 seemed to have sounded better than the 550 I have now. BUT that was a long time ago. Lol
 

THAFUZZ

Member (SA)
Sweet collection. I still miss My old JVC PC55. That unit was sweet. and it did have great bass and power.
 

blu_fuz

Well-Known Member
Staff member
347 Tony said:
bklyn sound said:
very nice collection ....your on your way :yes: :yes:
Tk you! My wife thinks I'm NUT'S!!!!!!!!!! :breakdance:


Show her pictures of our collections and tell her you havn't reached the "nuts" status on boomboxery yet :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.