I smell a class action lawsuit coming on!SLO said:I think this guy lugged one of those "totally portable" Sharps around2014-10-01 15.23.25.png![]()

. Although $1200 new back in 83 was steep for a portable but man did I want one!!!!!These were $1200 new?baddboybill said:Sold me. Although $1200 new back in 83 was steep for a portable but man did I want one!!!!!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk



OK, where did you get that copy of my blue badge photo?SLO said:I think this guy lugged one of those "totally portable" Sharps around2014-10-01 15.23.25.png![]()

and one of those could be hidden totally within the cabinet of the Sharp. Well in two planes it could, though the JVC would stick out of the back by around 2" and you'd want to take the record player out of the Sharp first.
If the VZ and PC-5 had a baby is would be a CINDER BLOCK with a handle!Beosystem10 said:OK, where did you get that copy of my blue badge photo?
The VZ looks mightily impressive whichever way you look at it - unless you're trapped under one in the desert and the next bus isn't due for hours - but weight? No, it's only about quarter of a Stone heavier than the JVC PC-5and one of those could be hidden totally within the cabinet of the Sharp. Well in two planes it could, though the JVC would stick out of the back by around 2" and you'd want to take the record player out of the Sharp first.
If the VZ and the much more densely built JVC fell in love and made a baby, it would probably look a lot like that hacked photo of the younger me.![]()

