New boombox in 80's retro style with radio, cassette, cd, usb, bluetooth, line in, mic in.

Reli

Boomus Fidelis

Welp, TechMoan's weighed in on this finally (against his better judgement), and the results are in: In short, expect low-end 1990 (or so) boombox quality, with all the modern features that people expect these days. He liked the sound quality, The FM & DAB/DAB+ worked decently if not spectacularly, the tape playback was surprisingly decent, but the record functions (even the USB/MicroSD!) are better off not being used.

Interesting, you can see on the heat sink that it doesn't use a class D amplifier
 
  • Like
Reactions: Transistorized

goodman

Member (SA)
I was a little disappointed by the review. I’ve owned this boombox for 6 months and I’d give it a solid 8/10.
Sound quality and build quality is great. Sounds as good as 95% of my vintage units. The sharp GF575 clone aesthetic is spot on too.
Only weakness is the high noise floor when recording to tape. NP for me bc I always record on a good home tape deck anyway.
I love this BBX so much I’m thinking about buying a second one. Definitely a cut above the lackluster “retro” units in recent years.
Feels like a legit old-school unit to me.
From the very beginning of the video, it is clear that Techmoan is doing this review not of his own free will but due to pressure from users.
Due to the fact that this is a 100% designed and made in China product, he is skeptical. I don't know if he read our topic and if it helped him.
In the middle of the video, he mentions that he likes how it sounds, but nevertheless he keeps comparing it to old high-end boomboxes and finds flaws in it...
At the end of the video, he didn't say anything specific - whether he likes it or not. He didn't make any recommendations - whether it's worth buying.
The positive thing is that the model has gained more popularity. In this case, I trust my impressions and those of you, who own this boombox.
I wish you all a pleasant entertainment and listening to music. :breakdance:
 

goodman

Member (SA)

Transistorized

Member (SA)
I am proud to say that after 6 months (or so) of ownership and playing cassettes, I can now see and monitor head wear. I have often tried to gage a cassette decks playback hours in relationship to the wear on the head. Now I know this is not an exact science but, I have noticed that I can barely see a flat spot in my Aiwa's cassette head with a flashlight.

edit: I'm probably the only person in the world that is excited about head wear. I'm going to wear this thing out before I die. That is my goal.
 
Last edited:

Jam_On_It

Member (SA)
From the very beginning of the video, it is clear that Techmoan is doing this review not of his own free will but due to pressure from users.
Due to the fact that this is a 100% designed and made in China product, he is skeptical. I don't know if he read our topic and if it helped him.
In the middle of the video, he mentions that he likes how it sounds, but nevertheless he keeps comparing it to old high-end boomboxes and finds flaws in it...
At the end of the video, he didn't say anything specific - whether he likes it or not. He didn't make any recommendations - whether it's worth buying.
The positive thing is that the model has gained more popularity. In this case, I trust my impressions and those of you, who own this boombox.
I wish you all a pleasant entertainment and listening to music. :breakdance:
I agree it’s pressure from users. It was a thinly veiled attempt to say “I know you want (and expect) me to bash it, so I’ll engage that.”
The absolute truth is - the Aiwa is one great boombox for the money. I LOVE mine specifically for its genuine old-school nature. Solid built quality, great authentic aesthetic, great sound quality, and a very reasonable price. It’s not the junk “retro” radio most others are pushing. The only weak spot is recording onto cassette. That feature is unusably bad. I did jump into the comments to set the record straight. I don’t think it’s fair to have this great radio bashed as another Chinese junker.
 

Jam_On_It

Member (SA)
I am proud to say that after 6 months (or so) of ownership and playing cassettes, I can now see and monitor head wear. I have often tried to gage a cassette decks playback hours in relationship to the wear on the head. Now I know this is not an exact science but, I have noticed that I can barely see a flat spot in my Aiwa's cassette head with a flashlight.

edit: I'm probably the only person in the world that is excited about head wear. I'm going to wear this thing out before I die. That is my goal.
“I’m going to wear this thing out before I die. That is my goal.”
Go brother. That’s one hell of an awesome comment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Transistorized

Thomy71

Member (SA)
What I really wonder is how people here could (if I remember it right) say the box has a decent record qualitiy. When I was young I was tricked by the local department store and bought a pretty bad box for my hard earned money. The tape recording of that thing was pretty bad already. But what I heard from THIS box on Techmoan's test was even a lot worse, which I would not have thought possible.

I think the video is quite fair, no dissing and even giving in that it was in part better than he thought before. "THESE", I guess, was most of all meant for the tape unit, which after all are always from the same producer as there are no alternatives, simple and not good.
 

Jam_On_It

Member (SA)
What I really wonder is how people here could (if I remember it right) say the box has a decent record qualitiy. When I was young I was tricked by the local department store and bought a pretty bad box for my hard earned money. The tape recording of that thing was pretty bad already. But what I heard from THIS box on Techmoan's test was even a lot worse, which I would not have thought possible.

I think the video is quite fair, no dissing and even giving in that it was in part better than he thought before. "THESE", I guess, was most of all meant for the tape unit, which after all are always from the same producer as there are no alternatives, simple and not good.

I’ve thoroughly tested all the record functions on this BBX.
For casual listening, CD to tape and Radio to tape is decent. I recorded rock music from CD and the noise floor is perfectly acceptable. No worse than the GE BBX I had in my youth. BT and AUX to cassette is terrible…hiss overpowers the music.
I know people have different opinions and I respect that…but I use this BBX daily and it’s a solid 8/10 (higher if cassette recording were better).
A really great product for the price. I just feel like he went into the review biased with his mind already made up. Damning it with faint praise didn’t help.
I love Matt’s channel but felt like he didn’t give this product a fair shake.

IMG_6119.jpeg
 
Last edited:

goodman

Member (SA)
What is the recording bitrate to USB/SD?

I think Transistorized mentioned 128 kbps:

For one, it doesn't like to record onto some USB/SD Cards. Size doesn't seem to matter when playing but,
recording onto one using this machine it gets a little picky.... Of course it records 128Kbps.
Not negatives. I'm just pointing out what I have noticed when recording :-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Transistorized