30/08/63 was the very day when Philips' then-new Compact Cassette format was released commercially.
Imagine how different our boxes would all be if Grundig's C100 format cassettes (image attached showing one of mine) had won the struggle for supremacy. Technically superior, Grundig machines ran at 2ips, the medium was thicker and tapes came as DC90s through 120 and 180 right up to DC240 and even now, dynamic range from this rudimentary, monaural portable is greater than that available from Compact Cassette and would remain so, at least while better 70μs Compact Cassette tapes came along.
I feel for poor old Max Grundig; why were technically inferior formats in both audio and video adopted as the default when Grundig's C100 and V2000 (the latter ironically developed in conjunction with his old rival Philips) were so much more durable and efficient? Maybe the fact that Grundig - back when the brand wasn't a generic name found on supermarket brand Vestel equipment - wasn't quite as cheap as others didn't help?
Imagine how different our boxes would all be if Grundig's C100 format cassettes (image attached showing one of mine) had won the struggle for supremacy. Technically superior, Grundig machines ran at 2ips, the medium was thicker and tapes came as DC90s through 120 and 180 right up to DC240 and even now, dynamic range from this rudimentary, monaural portable is greater than that available from Compact Cassette and would remain so, at least while better 70μs Compact Cassette tapes came along.
I feel for poor old Max Grundig; why were technically inferior formats in both audio and video adopted as the default when Grundig's C100 and V2000 (the latter ironically developed in conjunction with his old rival Philips) were so much more durable and efficient? Maybe the fact that Grundig - back when the brand wasn't a generic name found on supermarket brand Vestel equipment - wasn't quite as cheap as others didn't help?



