Fatdog said:I was thinking the passive radiator disc was aluminum. I could be wrong though.
tshorba said:Has anyone ever weighed the passive radiator/ABR wonder how close the replacements people use are
MasterBlaster84 said:Fatdog said:I was thinking the passive radiator disc was aluminum. I could be wrong though.
I think your right FD but I'm not at home to verify.
dave-bush said:at the moment its got a speaker in there....looks like a dual cone affair......cant test it though as im not getting any soundfrom the box at all......i need to re-foam the outers as well but i think the question has been answered about what should be there.........anyone any ideas what i can use as a replacement for the center
dave-bush said:at the moment its got a speaker in there....looks like a dual cone affair......cant test it though as im not getting any soundfrom the box at all......i need to re-foam the outers as well but i think the question has been answered about what should be there.........anyone any ideas what i can use as a replacement for the center
dave-bush said:thanks lads....excellent helpfull advice.....one more thing....i am gonna need some foam rings for the inner and outer holes in order to re-foam...
can anyone give me the size of the speakers for both size holes so i can order the foam......thnx
dave-bush said:thanks floyd...just ordered the outers from there....just need the size of the centre one now
MasterBlaster84 said:tshorba said:Has anyone ever weighed the passive radiator/ABR wonder how close the replacements people use are
I would caution against weighting the radiator, you will change the intended performance and put uneven stress on the surround. The radiator should literally be free floating and the only control characteristic should be provided by the stiffness of the surround. You could experiment with different surrounds to change the characterisitcs, using stiffer or floppier materials and this would achieve what your thinking.